BUILT FOR STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS

A second set of eyes.
For every

From the first submittal to the final revision. AI-assisted shop drawing review that keeps the evidence in view.

Create account
Harbor Exchange/ Steel connection review All changes saved
Comparing design and submission100%
Design reference S-502 · Detail 4IFC
Shop drawing SD-104 · Connection C-04REV 01
Potential discrepancyTR-001

Four bolts. Six specified.

Connection C-04 shows four bolts. Detail 4 on S-502 calls for six.

REQUIRED6 bolts
SUBMITTED4 bolts
Provide 6 bolts per 4/S-502
Compare the submission with its governing design.

THE WHOLE PICTURE

The requirement is rarely
on just one sheet.

Plans, schedules, general notes, typical details. Trace brings the selected sources into the review so you can follow each check back to its basis.

PROJECT SOURCES3 linked checks
General notesS-001
STRUCTURAL STEEL

Material grade

SpecifiedASTM A992SubmittedASTM A36
Different grade submitted
Connection detailS-502
DETAIL 4 · CONNECTION C-04
Specified
6 bolts
Submitted
4 bolts
Two bolts missing
Member scheduleS-201
MARKMEMBERGRADEB07W18×35A992B08W21×44A992B09W16×26A992
B07 submitted as W16×26
Trace
MATERIAL GRADE

B07 · Level 02

SpecifiedASTM A992
SourceS-001 · Notes

Potential mismatch. Engineer review required.

Design drawingsSpecificationsSchedules & detailsBulletins & sketchesDelegated design

01 / REVIEW WITH CONTEXT

Find the issue.
See the evidence.

Compare the submitted detail with the actual design requirement. Open the cited page, inspect the source and decide what needs a correction.

  • Source and submission, side by side
  • Page references and source quotations
  • Missing information kept visible
⠿ THE EVIDENCE TRAIL 4 / S-502
S-502 · DETAIL 4

“Provide (6) ¾″ diameter bolts
at beam connection.”

Source locatedRead the requirement in context.

02 / PIECE BY PIECE

A clear place
for every check.

Move through bar marks and piece marks with required and submitted values in view. Confirm a match, flag a mismatch or leave a question for review.

AI-proposed match Engineer-confirmed Potential mismatch Needs review
PIECE INVESTIGATION FOOTING REINFORCEMENT
MARK / LOCATIONCOMPARISON
R1Footing F1 · #5 @ 12″Proposed match
R2Footing F2 · Bar sizePotential mismatch
R3Footing F3 · Lap spliceNeeds review
R1: source and submission both show #5.

Engineers verify requirements and record the review decision.

03 / MAKE IT CLEAR

Your review.
Right on the drawing.

Sketch a detail, route a leader and add a note. Keep your working copy, calibrated measurements and reviewed exports together.

  • Structural symbols and material hatches
  • Notes, leaders and calibrated measurements
  • Saved markups with originals preserved
ENGINEER’S WORKING COPY SD-104 · REV 01
Aa▱◯∿▥
Provide 6 bolts
per detail 4/S-502.
✓ Working copy saved

04 / CLOSE THE LOOP

A new revision.
The same attention
to detail.

Carry earlier comments into the next review. Compare the correction evidence and record what was addressed, what remains open and what needs another look.

Rev 01Original submission
Rev 02Resubmission
AM
Engineer’s comment

Provide 6 bolts at connection C-04
per detail 4/S-502.

Carried forward from Rev 01
TR-001
PREVIOUS4 boltsCorrection requested
RESUBMITTED6 bolts ✓Correction found

Evidence suggests addressed.
Ready for the engineer to verify.

✓

FROM UPLOAD TO RETURNED REVIEW

One connected workflow.

01

Build the review basis.

Add the design sources, specifications and submitted shop drawings.

02

Review with evidence.

Inspect AI findings, investigate pieces and annotate the working copy.

03

Return a clear decision.

Record the engineer’s review, export the package and track the next revision.

The engineer stays at the center.

AI surfaces potential discrepancies. Engineers verify the evidence and make the review decision.

A FEW DETAILS

Before you open
the next drawing.

Who is Trace built for?+

Structural engineers reviewing shop drawings during construction administration. Trace helps engineering teams compare submissions with project requirements, record review decisions and follow corrections across revisions.

What can I upload?+

PDF shop drawings and their applicable design sources, including structural drawings, schedules, typical details, specifications, bulletins and delegated design documents. Trace supports files up to 20 MB and 100 pages each, with a combined AI review limit of 25 MB and 60 pages.

Does Trace make the approval decision?+

The assigned engineer verifies findings and records a manual review decision. AI findings can be incomplete or incorrect. Trace does not calculate structural capacity, certify code compliance or independently approve fabrication.

Do I need to change my drawing software?+

Trace works in the browser with exported PDFs. Upload the selected drawings, compare them, add review markups and export a reviewed copy. Your original uploaded files remain separate.

How do I get started?+

Create your account, confirm your email, and open your private workspace. Add a project and upload its design sources and shop drawings to begin. If you already have an account, sign in.

YOUR NEXT REVIEW STARTS HERE

Bring the next
drawing into focus.

Keep every drawing, review and decision connected.

Already have an account? Sign in to your workspace.